nathanael.ink

i don’t have
what you have
to say

someday
i’ll die

it won’t matter
what a fool i made
how i wrote
to nobody

but i wrote
a while
and died
how we all die

the spiritual place i live
is too big for god
and you
and all these kids
it’s too big
i want to move

to a little place
where all that fits is my hand with a pen
a little paper
where i squeeze in words
and press them out the mail slot
i’ll know, in a spiritual place like that,
what meaning is
and how lovely i am

---

Host: Welcome, everyone. Let’s dive into this intriguing poem. It touches on themes of mortality, isolation, and the search for meaning. One line that stands out is “the spiritual place I live is too big for God and you and all these kids; it’s too big; I want to move.” What do you make of the space being “too big”?

Guest 1: That line immediately brings to mind Rainer Maria Rilke’s exploration of vast inner spaces in “The Duino Elegies.” The poet feels overwhelmed by the enormity of their own spiritual or emotional world—a space so expansive that even God and loved ones don’t fit. It’s a powerful metaphor for existential isolation.

Guest 2: I see where you’re coming from, but I think that’s giving the poem too much credit. Unlike Rilke, who masterfully navigates complex emotions, this poem feels like a half-baked attempt at profundity. The notion of a space being “too big” for God seems forced and pretentious.

Guest 3: I disagree. The exaggeration serves to emphasize the speaker’s sense of alienation. It echoes Emily Dickinson’s reclusive tendencies, especially in poems like “The Soul selects her own Society.” The desire to “move to a little place” reflects a craving for simplicity and control over one’s environment.

Guest 4: I think there’s also a nod to the minimalist ethos of poets like William Carlos Williams. The focus on “a little paper” and “squeezing in words” suggests that meaning is found in the small, tangible aspects of life. The poet wants to distill experience into something manageable.

Guest 2: But that’s precisely my issue with the poem. It tries to mimic the minimalism of Williams without achieving the same impact. In “The Red Wheelbarrow,” every word carries weight. Here, the language is flat, and the imagery is lackluster. Pressing words out a mail slot? It feels contrived.

Guest 1: I think you’re being overly harsh. The mail slot could symbolize the limited means through which the poet communicates with the outside world. It’s a poignant image of isolation, similar to the confinement in T.S. Eliot’s “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock,” where the speaker is trapped in his own indecision.

Guest 3: Yes, and the admission of “writing to nobody” reflects a sense of futility in creative expression, much like Franz Kafka’s struggles with obscurity. Yet, the poet continues to write, which highlights a resilient dedication to their craft.

Guest 2: Or perhaps it’s just self-indulgent rambling. Unlike Kafka, whose themes of alienation are profound and universally resonant, this poem reads like a personal diary entry that fails to engage the reader.

Guest 4: I think there’s value in the rawness of the poem. It doesn’t hide behind elaborate metaphors. The straightforward confession “I’ll die… and died as we all die” connects the personal to the universal, reminding me of the stoic acceptance in Philip Larkin’s “Aubade.”

Guest 2: Larkin’s work is far more nuanced. “Aubade” confronts mortality with elegance and depth. This poem, on the other hand, states the obvious without offering any new insight.

Guest 1: Not every poem needs to reinvent the wheel. Sometimes, reaffirming common experiences can be powerful. The line “how lovely I am” at the end suggests a journey towards self-acceptance, which is both intimate and relatable.

Guest 2: It comes across as narcissistic rather than enlightening. Claiming self-loveliness without demonstrating any growth or revelation feels empty.

Guest 3: Perhaps the poet is critiquing the idea of seeking validation externally. By moving to a “little place,” they find meaning within themselves. It’s akin to Thoreau’s retreat to Walden Pond—seeking simplicity to discover deeper truths.

Guest 4: That’s a compelling interpretation. The poem could be seen as a modern reflection on self-reliance and introspection, themes prevalent in the works of the Transcendentalists.

Guest 2: If that’s the case, it lacks the philosophical rigor of Thoreau or Emerson. Their writings inspire contemplation. This poem barely scratches the surface.

Host: It seems we have a divide in opinions. Let’s consider the poem’s structure and style. Does its simplicity enhance or detract from its message?

Guest 1: I believe the simplicity enhances it. The unadorned language strips away pretense, much like the poetry of Charles Bukowski. It’s raw and unfiltered.

Guest 2: Bukowski’s rawness had grit and authenticity. This feels more like a rough draft that needed more time to develop.

Guest 3: Sometimes, the unpolished nature of a poem can be its strength. It captures a moment in time, a snapshot of the poet’s inner world.

Guest 2: Or it simply shows a lack of effort. Poetry is an art form that demands precision and care.

Guest 4: While craftsmanship is important, emotion and honesty are equally vital. The poem conveys a sincere struggle with meaning and existence.

Guest 2: Sincerity doesn’t automatically equate to quality. Without engaging language or innovative ideas, the poem falls flat.

Host: Let’s circle back to the concept of the space being “too big.” Do you think this is effectively conveyed?

Guest 3: I do. It evokes a feeling of being overwhelmed by one’s thoughts and emotions. The vastness is suffocating, which is paradoxical and thought-provoking.

Guest 1: Agreed. It also touches on the limitations of language to express profound experiences—a theme explored by poets like Rumi.

Guest 2: Comparing this poem to Rumi is a stretch. Rumi’s work transcends cultural and temporal boundaries with its depth. This poem lacks that universality.

Guest 4: While it may not reach the heights of Rumi, it offers a personal perspective that can still resonate with readers.

Guest 2: Perhaps, but for me, it doesn’t. The poem needs more refinement to truly make an impact.

Host: Thank you all for your candid insights. It’s clear that this poem sparks diverse reactions, which in itself is a testament to the power of poetry to provoke thought and discussion.